Judgment · High Court · 2024
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
In view of the above, the instant petition is dismissed for
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. In view of the above, the instant petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP-4669-1994 (O&M) Date of Decision: 25.10.2024 Harcharan Kaur (since deceased) through LRs and others ….Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ….Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSH BUNGER Present : None for the petitioners. Mr. Praveen Chander Goyal, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Mr. Rajinder Singh Banger, Advocate for Mr. Rajinder Goel, Advocate for respondents No.5 to 10. HARSH BUNGER, J. (Oral) ***
#1. This petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India inter alia seeking a writ in the nature of Certiorari for quashing Annexures P-9 to P-13.
#2. Despite second call, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners in Court today. It appears that the petitioners are no more interested in pursuing the present petition.
#3. In view of the above, the instant petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
#5. All pending application(s), if any, shall stand closed. A copy of this order be sent to the petitioners at the address mentioned in the Memo of Parties.
25.10.2024 Himani (HARSH BUNGER) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable: Yes/No Yes/No HIMANI GUPTA 2024.10.25 15:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the above, the instant petition is dismissed for
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 226, 227.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 25 Oct 2024. The bench was HARSH BUNGER.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.