Aditya Sharma & Anr. v. Mr. Nirmaljit Singh Diwana, Sr. DAG, Punjab
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 ss. 11, 12
- Constitution of India art. 215
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that since the case FIR already stands registered against the accused persons, therefore, the present petition has been rendered infructuous and same may be disposed of accordingly.
Judgment
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSH BUNGER Present: Mr. Sanjeev Manhas, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Nirmaljit Singh Diwana, Sr. DAG, Punjab. ***** HARSH BUNGER J. (Oral) 1 Present contempt petition has been filed under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India, for alleging non-compliance of the order dated
30.07.2024 (Annexure P-1) passed by this Court in CWP-2066-2018.
#2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that since the case FIR already stands registered against the accused persons, therefore, the present petition has been rendered infructuous and same may be disposed of accordingly.
21.07.2026 Ankit Ordered accordingly. All the pending application(s), if any, shall also stand closed. (HARSH BUNGER) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable: Yes/No Yes/No
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 — ss. 11, 12; Constitution of India — art. 215.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 21 Jul 2026. The bench was HARSH BUNGER.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.