Ramanjit Kaur & Anr. v. Partap Singh, Inspector
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Consequently, the petition is dismissed
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
Consequently, the petition is dismissed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioners to file a fresh petition taking into consideration the later events, if any, and if so required or desired. Rule discharged. September 18, 2006. kadyan [ Surya Kant ] Judge
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Consequently, the petition is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 18 Sep 2006. The bench was NONE, SURYA KANT.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. 1091 of 2005).
← Search more judgments