G. Manikyam v. K.Nagabhusana Rao, the Secretary and Cor
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 ss. 10, 11, 12
Judgment
Cause title
The Contempt Case coming on for hearing upon perusing the case and the affidavit filed herein and the order of the High Court dated: 14-03- 2008, 11-04-2008 & 25-04-2008 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of
Sri G. Vasantha Rayudu, Advocate for the petitioner and of
Sri P.
Sri Raghuram, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1, and of the G.P. for School Education, for the Respondent No. 2, the Court made the following
ORDER:
In view of the facts and circumstances stated in the accompanying affidavit, the presence of the second respondent is dispensed the with for the present. List the matter after two weeks for reporting compliance of the order of this Court dated: 25-04-2008
. DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To
The District Educational Officer, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District (BY RPAD) 3 K.Nagabhusana Rao, the Secretary and Correspondent, Port Education Society, Visakhapatnam Port Trust, Visakhapatnam-530 035. (BY RPAD) 4 One CC to P Sri Raghuram, Advocate (OPUC) 5 One CC to Sri Sri G. Vasantha Rayudu, Advocate (OPUC) 6 Two CCs to the G.P. for School Education, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad (OUT) 7 One spare copy. Ksv Ksv Date of drafting: 19-05-2008 HIGH COURT GRJ DATE: 17-06-2008 NOTE: LIST THE MATTER AFTER TWO WEEKS FOR REPORTING COMPLIANCE C.C. NO. 236 OF 2006 DISPENSING WITH THE PRESENCE OF R2
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.