Shivba Shikshan And Bahuuddeshiya Sevabhavi Sanstha Sanchalit School v. Nutan Vidhyalya Shikshan Sanstha Shelu Thruogh Its President & Anr.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Cause title
p5 to p9.odtIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD5
WRIT PETITION NO.299 OF 2026
Shivba Shikshan And Bahuuddeshiya Sevabhavi Sanstha Sanchalit School
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Others...
Mr. D. B. Pokale, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. R. S. Wani, AGP for Respondents/State.
Mr. S. B. Pulkundwar, Advocate for Respondent No.4.…AND6
WRIT PETITION NO.300 OF 2026
Nutan Vidhyalya Shikshan Sanstha Shelu Thruogh Its President And Another
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Others...
Mr. D. B. Pokale, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. S. B. Pulkundwar, AGP for Respondents/State.
Mr. A. R Nikam, Advocate for Respondent No.4.…AND7
WRIT PETITION NO.301 OF 2026
Shree Samarath Yogabhyanand Yonkatnath Maharaj Deogaon Rangari TrustNagpur Thr Its President
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretory And Others...
Mr. D. B. Pokale, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Ms. N. B. Kamble, AGP for Respondents/State.
Mr. S. R. Dheple, Advocate for Respondent No.4.…AND8
WRIT PETITION NO.302 OF 2026
Late Bapurao Patil Narwade Gram Vikas Sanstha Pachod Through Its SecretaryAnd Another
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Others...
Mr. D. B. Pokale, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. A. B. Girase, GP for Respondents/State.
Mr. S. R. Dheple, Advocate for Respondent No.4.[1] p5 to p9.odt…AND9
WRIT PETITION NO.303 OF 2026
Balaghat Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Pargaon Sanchalit School And Others
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Others...
Mr. D. B. Pokale, Advocate for the Petitioners.
Mr. S. K. Tambe, AGP for Respondents/State.
Mr. P. D. Suryawanshi, Advocate for Respondent No.4....
CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI & HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, JJ. DATE : 08 JANUARY 2026
ORDER :.
These are the petitions of reimbursement of fees in respect of 25%students admitted by the petitioner/management under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009.
Issue notice to the respondents. Learned AGPs waive notice forrespondents/State in respective petitions. Learned Advocates Mr. S. B.Pulkundwar, Mr. A. R. Nikam, Mr. S. R. Dheple and Mr. P. D. Suryawanshiwaive notice for respondent No.4/Zilla Parishad in respective petitions.
We have heard both the sides.
We dispose of these writ petitions by directing the respondents toundertake scrutiny of petitioners’ proposal independently on their own[2] p5 to p9.odtmerits and take appropriate decision as expeditiously as possible and inany case, within a period of (04) weeks from today and if the petitionersare found entitled to get reimbursement, shall disburse the money to thepetitioners within a period of four weeks thereafter. [ HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR ] [ SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI ] JUDGE JUDGEscm[3]
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.