State.Mr v. D. Patnoorkar
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Cause title
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.503 OF 2026
Abhinav Shikshan Sanstha Through its President
Shri. Madhukarrao s/oLaxman NawaleVersusThe State of Maharashtra and others
Mr. S. K. Shinde, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. AGP for respondent Nos.1 and 2/State.
Mr. V. D. Patnoorkar, Advocate for respondent No.3....
CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI & HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, JJ. DATE : 17 FEBRUARY 2026
ORDER :.
This is the petition of reimbursement of fees in respect of 25%students admitted by the petitioner/management under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009.
Issue notice to the respondents. Learned AGP waives notice forrespondent Nos.1 and 2/State. Learned Advocates Mr. V. D. Patnoorkarwaives notice for respondent No.3.
We have heard both the sides.[1] 933-wp-503-2026.odt4.We dispose of this writ petition by directing the respondents toundertake scrutiny of petitioners’ proposals independently on their ownmerits and take appropriate decision as expeditiously as possible and inany case, within a period of (04) weeks from today and if the petitionersare found entitled to get reimbursement, shall disburse the money to thepetitioners within a period of four weeks thereafter. [ HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR ] [ SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI ] JUDGE JUDGEscm[2]
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.