TP No. 3532 of 2025 · Bombay High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Ld. Advocate for the Petitioner submits that he will comply the as per clause no. 2 of the Will some amount to be paid to some institutions. Accordingly, the petitioner decided to donate the amount of Rs.5 lacs to Chitpavan Bhraman Sangh, Mulund East…
Judgment
Shri. Saurabh Oka Ld. Advocate for the Petitioner
Ld. Advocate for the Petitioner submits that he will comply the as per clause no. 2 of the Will some amount to be paid to some institutions. Accordingly, the petitioner decided to donate the amount of Rs.5 lacs to Chitpavan Bhraman Sangh, Mulund East, and Heramb Ganpati Mandir Kher Section, Ambernath. Ld. Advocate for the petitioner has moved the praecipe dated 09.01.2026, in this regard. The praecipe is kept along with this order. Ld. Advocate for the petitioner to upload the said praecipe in the CIS. Hence, in view of the Section 53 of the Maharashtra Public Trust Act, 1950, petitioner to serve the copy of the Will upon the Charity Commissioner. Hence, adjourned. S. O. to 29.01.2026
09.01.2026 with Testamentary Department Officer on Special Duty,
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Maharashtra Public Trust Act, 1950 — s. 53.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 09 Jan 2026.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.