✦ Bombay High Court · 09 Mar 2026

United Church Of Northon India Trust Association v. State Of Maharashtra Thr. Govt Pleader & Ors.

Wp No. 13353 of 2025N JAMADAR

Case at a glance

Outcome

Withdrawn

The petition stands dismissed as withdrawn

Provisions considered

Judgment

Mr. Saket Mone a/w Dhrendra Sinha i/b Vidhi Partners, for the Petitioner. Mr. A. I. Patel, AGP a/w S. D. Chipade, AGP for the Respondent-State. CORAM: DATE : N. J. JAMADAR, J. 09th MARCH 2026 P.C.:

2.

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner. Mr. Saket Mone, learned counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the petition. He, however, submits that as the application for grant of permission for sale under Section 36 of the Maharashtra Public Trust Act, 1950 is awaiting adjudication for almost two years, the learned Charity Commissioner be directed to hear and decide the Application No.102 of 2024 in a time frame.

3.

Having regard to the mandate of the provisions contained in Section 36 of the Maharashtra Public Trust Act, 1950, the prayer of the Petitioner is justifiable.

Operative part

4.

The petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.

5.

The learned Charity Commissioner seized with Application 10-WP-13353-2025.DOC No.102 of 2024 is requested to hear and decide the said application as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of three months from the date of communication of this order.

6.

All contentions of the all the parties are kept open.

[N. J. JAMADAR, J.]

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The petition stands dismissed as withdrawn

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Maharashtra Public Trust Act, 1950 — s. 36.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 09 Mar 2026. The bench was N JAMADAR.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Wp No. 13353 of 2025). ← Search more judgments