WP No. 13472 of 2025 · Bombay High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. In result, Writ Petition is partly allowed. The impugned order dated6/10/2025 passed by ACC, Dhule is quashed and set aside. The ACC shall pass suitable orders permitting Petitioner to operate Trust bank account jointly withACC himself or with any other officer authorized by him…
Judgment
Cause title
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 13472 OF 2025
Shri. Mahant Kashigiri MaharajVice Chairman of the Trust Aged: 84 years, Occ: Pujari, R/o Nagai Mata Mandir Kokale, Tq. Sakri, Dist: Dhule....Petitioner
VERSUS
1.Bhausaheb Rajaram NavareAged: Major, Occ: Business R/o Kokale, Tq. Sakri, Dist :- Dhule2.Digamber Sadashiv Giri Baba (Died)3. Ramesh Sudam Sonar (Died)4. Chagan Bhaga PatilAged: Major, Occ: Business, R/o Kokale, Tq. Sakri, Dist Dhule. 5. The Assistant Charity Commissioner, Dhule Division, Dhule. 6. Ravindra Hiralal ChaudhariAged: Major, Occ: Business, R/o Chaudhari Galli, Nandurbar. 7. Bhalerao Namdev SalunkeAged: Major, Occ: Business, R/o Snehraj, Shrikrushna Nagar, Near Tulshiram Nagar, Devpur, Dhule....Respondents
***•
Mr. P. C. Mayure, Advocate for the Petitioner•
Mr. S. K. Shirse, AGP for the Respondent No.6/State***
CORAM:S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J
RESERVED ON:MAY 06, 2026
RESERVED ON:MAY 08, 2026PAGE 1 OF 4 WP-13472-2025.odtFINAL
ORDER :
The present Writ Petition takes exception to order dated 6-10-2025passed by Assistant Charity Commissioner, Dhule (for short ‘ACC’) in InquiryApplication No.98/2025, whereby, Petitioner's application filed under section41A of Maharashtra Public Trust Act, 1950 (for short ‘Act of 1950’) came to be rejected.
The petitioner is the founder trustee of Shri. Nagai Mata Mandir, Nagapur (Kokle), Tq. Sakri, Dist. Dhule. The ACC, Dhule, by order dated 20-11-1997, allowed application under section 50-A (1) of Bombay Public TrustAct, 1954 for settlement of scheme. The Petitioner is the founder Vice Chairmanof Trust. Shri Vasantrao Sudham Pingale was Chairman of Trust. The trustees were entitled to appoint three more trustees. The bank account of trust was tobe operated by Vice Chairman and Chairman jointly. Meanwhile, there was change in composition of trust due to death/resignation of trustees. ThePetitioner continued to be Vice Chairman. The change reports in respect of appointment of new trustees on resignation/death of original trustees are pending before ACC. In light of pendency of change reports, business of trust is standstill. The Petitioner, who is Vice Chairman and also Pujari, is not in a position to manage religious and cultural activities and maintenance of Trust property forwant of funds. As long as issue as to change reports in respect of appointment of Chairman is not decided, it was necessary to make an arrangement for operationPAGE 2 OF 4 WP-13472-2025.odtof bank account. Eventually, Petitioner filed an application under Section 41-A of Act of 1950 before ACC, Dhule, who rejected same by order dated 06-10-2025.The learned ACC observed that Inquiry Application No. 562 of 2024 for provisional approval of the change report was opposed by Petitioner. Similarly, Application Nos. 504 of 2024 and 274 of 2024 are pending in respect of composition of Trust and appointment of Chairman. The Petitioner has also raised his objection in those change reports. Therefore, there is a dispute among trustees. The prayer of Petitioner is beyond scope of Section 41 of Act. 3. The learned Advocate appearing for Petitioner submits that Petitioner is the founder trustee and Vice Chairman of Shri. Nagai Mata Mandir. The bank account was operated as per the scheme by him and Chairman. Now, change report as to appointment of Chairman is subjudice, Petitioner is facing difficulty to carry out day-to-day administration and activities of Trust for wantof funds. The Petitioner may be permitted to operate bank accounts along with any Officer appointed by ACC to facilitate day-to-day administration of Trust.
Having considered submissions advanced by learned Advocatesappearing for respective parties, it can be observed that as per scheme sanctioned under section 50-A(1) of Bombay Public Trust Act, Petitioner is Vice Chairmanof trust. Initially, Trust was consisting of two trustees. Chairman of trust has resigned. The change report in respect of appointment of other trustees and new chairman is subjudice. The trust is a temple. It needs to carry out daily puja, archaPAGE 3 OF 4 WP-13472-2025.odtand other cultural and religious activities. As per clause 21 of scheme, Chairmanand Vice Chairman have powers to maintain and operate bank account.
In this backdrop, this Court finds that only because change reports in respect of appointment of other trustees and Chairman of the trust is pending adjudication, day-to-day administration of trust need not suffer. The Petitioner is admittedly founder Vice Chairman of trust. He was in charge of day-to-dayadministration. Therefore, by way of interim arrangement, Petitioner can be permitted to operate trust account jointly with ACC himself or any other authorized person appointed by him. The ACC can impose necessary condition for operation of bank account so as to maintain transparency and accountability of expenses from trust account.
In result, Writ Petition is partly allowed. The impugned order dated6/10/2025 passed by ACC, Dhule is quashed and set aside. The ACC shall pass suitable orders permitting Petitioner to operate Trust bank account jointly withACC himself or with any other officer authorized by him, till decision on pending change reports regarding appointment of Chairman/President. (S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.) UmeshPAGE 4 OF 4
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.