✦ Allahabad High Court

Sataguru Sharan v. Addl. Commissioner, Devi Patan & Ors.

No. 7491 of 2025ALOK MATHUR

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of

Key paragraphs

  • Para 88. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. December 19, 2025 A. Verma (Alok Mathur,J.)

Judgment

1.

Heard Sri Abhishek Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.

2.

In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents is dispensed with.

3.

Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 - Additional Commissioner, Devi Patan Division, Goda, to decide Appeal No. 413 of 2022 (Computerized Case No. C 202208000000413) - Sataguru Sharan Vs. Shakir and Others, U/S 207 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 - Additional Commissioner, Devi Patan Division, Goda, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.

5.

Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.

6.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. 1 - Additional Commissioner, Devi Patan Division, Goda, is directed to decide Appeal No. 413 of 2022 (Computerized Case No. C 202208000000413) - Sataguru Sharan Vs. Shakir and Others, U/S 207 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of one year from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.

7.

It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.

Operative part

8.

With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. December 19, 2025 A. Verma (Alok Mathur,J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Allahabad High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. No. 7491 of 2025). ← Search more judgments