Smt. Sursati v. Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Kaiserganj, Bahraich & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
With the aforesaid observations, the petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 227
Key paragraphs
- Para 77. With the aforesaid observations, the petition is disposed of. August 26, 2025 A. Verma (Alok Mathur,J.)
Judgment
Smt. Sursati Versus .....Petitioner(s) Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Kaiserganj, Bahraich And Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vijayendra Prakash Tripathi, Rajesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta Singh Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
Heard Sri Vijayendra Prakash Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
In view of the proposed order notice to private respondent is dispensed with.
By means of the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India prayer has been made for direction to respondent no. 1 - Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil - Kaiserganj, District - Bahraich, for expeditious disposal of Case No. T - 202508150305069 - Ram Sagar Vs. Smt. Sursati and Others.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 - Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil - Kaiserganj, District - Bahraich, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
At this stage, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach the Court concerned and move an appropriate application detailing urgency for expeditious disposal of Case No. T - 202508150305069 - Ram Sagar Vs. Smt. Sursati and Others, along with the order passed by this Court, within two weeks from today, and in case, if such an application is moved, the Court/Authority shall consider and decide the same within three weeks thereafter, and in case, any case for urgency is made out by the petitioner, it shall pass appropriate orders thereupon, and proceed in accordance with law.
It is made clear that this Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merit and the Court concerned shall decide the matter strictly in accordance with law.
Operative part
With the aforesaid observations, the petition is disposed of. August 26, 2025 A. Verma (Alok Mathur,J.)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: With the aforesaid observations, the petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 227.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.