Mangesh Bhalchandra Gaikwad v. The State Of Maharashtra ...RespondentsAND(SR. NO.42) INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 15618 OF 2024 & Anr.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
Interim applications are allowed in aforesaid terms
Judgment
Operative part
38, 42 & 43 IA-12367-2024.doc2.We have perused the applications and heard the learned counselfor the parties. Considering the reasons mentioned in the applications, the orders refusing registration are recalled subject to office objectionsbeing removed within a period of four weeks from today. 3. On aforesaid terms, the writ petitions would be restored to file. 4. Interim applications are allowed in aforesaid terms. (M.M. SATHAYE, J.) (A.S. CHANDURKAR, J.)Husen 2/2
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Ia No. 12367 of 2024).
← Search more judgments