Hafsa Nooruddin Shaikh v. Sarifabi Abubaker Lambey & Anr.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
The Application is allowed
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. The Application is disposed of in above terms. (M. M. SATHAYE, J.)
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 222 OF 2024 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 577 OF 2011 Hafsa Nooruddin Shaikh In the matter between: Sakina Nooruddin Shaikh & Ors. Versus ...Applicant ....Applicants Sarifabi Abubaker Lambey & Anr. ...Respondents Mr. Anil R. Mishra for the Applicants. Adv. Rushikesh S. Kekane i/b Adv. P. J. Thorat for the Respondent Nos. 1&2 **** **** CORAM : M. M. SATHAYE, J. DATED : 3rd OCTOBER 2025 P.C.:
Heard learned Counsel for the parties. This is an Application for bringing legal heirs of Deceased Respondent No. 1 – Sarifabi Abubaker Lambey on record. There is delay of 35 days in filing the Application. No reply is filed.
Learned Advocate appearing for the Respondents submits that he is also appearing for the proposed Respondents as shown in the schedule. Considering the averments in the Application, sufficient cause is made out.
Operative part
The Application is allowed. Delay is condoned. The Applicants are permitted to bring Respondent No. 1(a) and 1(b) on record. Amendment to be carried out on or before 15/10/2025 with service of amended copy on the other side.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The Application is allowed
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 03 Oct 2025. The bench was M M SATHAYE.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.