Dist. Sangli Through Principal : Mrs. Sarika Savankumar Darure ] ] ] v. The State of Maharashtra, Through School Education Department
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
In the aforesaid facts, the writ petition is disposed of by directing
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Rule is disposed of in aforesaid terms with no order as to costs. [ M.M. SATHAYE, J. ] [ A.S. CHANDURKAR, J. ] 912-WP-2746-2025-Corrected Judgment Pursuant to Speaking to Minutes Order dt.4-4-2025.doc Dixit
Judgment
Cause title
Mr. Aditya Raktade with
Mr. Sumit Vhanbatte and Mr. Anup Kamble, Advocates for the Petitioner. Mr. A.I. Patel, Additional Government Pleader with Mr. Y.D. Patil, Assistant Government Pleader for the Respondent-State of Maharashtra.
CORAM : A.S. CHANDURKAR & M.M. SATHAYE, JJ DATE : 27TH MARCH 2025.
ORAL JUDGMENT :
{ Per A.S. Chandurkar, J. }
Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard learned counsel for the parties.
The petitioner is an Educational Institution seeking reimbursement of grant under the provisions of Section 12(2) of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, previously part amount of the grant has been reimbursed and now the entitlement is for balance amount of such further grant. 912-WP-2746-2025-Corrected Judgment Pursuant to Speaking to Minutes Order dt.4-4-2025.doc Dixit
The learned Additional Government Pleader, on instructions, submits that the respondent no.2 is the Competent Authority to consider the entitlement of the petitioner.
Operative part
In the aforesaid facts, the writ petition is disposed of by directing respondent no.2 to consider the entitlement of the petitioner to reimbursement of grant under Section 12(2) of the Act of 2009. The respondent no.3 shall furnish necessary information to the said Authorities, as required. The aforesaid process of considering the entitlement of the petitioner be undertaken and completed within a period of three months of receiving copy of this order. Needless to state that on such entitlement being found, further consequential steps shall be taken by the respondents.
Rule is disposed of in aforesaid terms with no order as to costs. [ M.M. SATHAYE, J. ] [ A.S. CHANDURKAR, J. ] 912-WP-2746-2025-Corrected Judgment Pursuant to Speaking to Minutes Order dt.4-4-2025.doc Dixit
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In the aforesaid facts, the writ petition is disposed of by directing
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 — s. 12(2).
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 27 Mar 2025. The bench was M M SATHAYE, A S CHANDURKAR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.