✦ Orissa High Court

Saismita Baliarsingh v. Mr.S.N.Das, ASC

ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMP No. 2601 of 2022S K PANIGRAHI

Case at a glance

Bench
S K PANIGRAHI

Judgment

Mr.Alok Kumar Das, Adv. State of Odisha &Ors. -versus- …. Opposite Parties Mr.S.N.Das, ASC CORAM: DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI Order No. ORDER 02.01.2023 01

1.

This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned counsel for the State.

3.

According to learned counsel for the Petitioner, the grievance of the Petitioner in this case is that the Petitioner has filed a written report on 30.09.2022 before the Inspector In-charge, Sukinda Police Station, district Jajpur, (opposite party No.3) for registration. As no action has been taken by the said opposite party, the petitioner sent a grievance petition the opposite party No.2/Superintendent of Police, Jajpur on 10.11.2022 by Regd. Post.. However, the F.I.R. has not been registered. In such background, he prays that necessary direction be // 2 // given to the opposite party No.3 to take a decision on the above noted written report within a specific time period.

4.

Considering the submissions made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court directs the Inspector In-charge, Sukinda Police Station, Jajpur to take a decision on the written report in accordance with law, keeping in the mind the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Lalita Kumari v. Govt. of U.P. & Others1 within a period of four weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if in the meantime, the same has not been disposed of.

5.

Accordingly, this CRLMP is disposed of.

6.

Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application. Judge (Dr. S.K. Panigrahi) LB 1 AIR 2014 SC 187

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Orissa High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMP No. 2601 of 2022). ← Search more judgments