Nirmal Barik & Anr. v. State of Odisha
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 11. Accepting the memo filed as at Flag-C and recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioners, the ABLAPL is disposed of as being withdrawn. (R.K. Pattanaik) Balaram Judge
Judgment
Petitioners Mr. R.K. Nayak, Advocate …. -Versus- State of Odisha Opposite Party Mr. S.K. Brahma, ASC …. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK ORDER 09.07.2026 Order No.
1.
Accepting the memo filed as at Flag-C and recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioners, the ABLAPL is disposed of as being withdrawn. (R.K. Pattanaik) Balaram Judge
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Orissa High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No. 7495 of 2026).
← Search more judgments