✦ Orissa High Court

Bhima @ Bikash Behera & Anr. v. State of Odisha

ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMC No. 2035 of 2022R K PATTANAIK

Case at a glance

Bench
R K PATTANAIK

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 66. Having regard to the above facts and recording the submission that the NBWAs are still pending execution, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioners should be allowed to surrender before the court below and go on bail on such terms and conditions…
  • Para 77. Consequently, the CRLMC stands disposed of directing the petitioners to surrender before the learned Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge (F.T.S.C.), Balasore in S.T. No.149 of 2016 on or before 26th September, 2022 and in the event their surrender, the court below shall release them on…

Judgment

Petitioners Mr.Vivekanand Jena, Advocate -Versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr. Pradip Kumar Rout, AGA CORAM: MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK ORDER

05.09.2022 Order No.

1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

2.

The instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners challenging the impugned order dated 15th February, 2020 under Annexure-2 passed by the learned court below whereby the non-bailable warrants of arrest have been issued against them on the grounds stated therein.

3.

Perused the FIR as at Annexure-1 and also the copy of the impugned order i.e. Annexure-2.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that on the date fixed by the court below, they could not be present and as no step was taken by the conducting counsel appearing for the petitioners, learned court below issued the NBWAs, which are pending execution. It is submitted that the default was not intentional, which has been objected to by the counsel for the State.

5.

However, this Court does not find any infirmity committed by the learned court below so as to warrant any interference as there was default on the part of the petitioners for which the order of NBWAs has been issued, which is absolutely justified.

6.

Having regard to the above facts and recording the submission that the NBWAs are still pending execution, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioners should be allowed to surrender before the court below and go on bail on such terms and conditions as would be fixed by the court below. Accordingly, it is ordered.

7.

Consequently, the CRLMC stands disposed of directing the petitioners to surrender before the learned Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge (F.T.S.C.), Balasore in S.T. No.149 of 2016 on or before 26th September, 2022 and in the event their surrender, the court below shall release them on bail on such terms and conditions as deemed just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and only after recording their statements under Section 313 Cr.P.C. (R.K. Pattanaik) Judge U.K.Sahoo

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Orissa High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMC No. 2035 of 2022). ← Search more judgments