Sangram Patra & Anr. v. State of Orissa & Anr.
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. No one appears for the petitioners at the time of call. This case is of the year 2013 and nine years have already been passed from the date of filing of this case. As such, the petitioners appear to be recalcitrant litigants and have…
Judgment
ORDER 20.06.2022 Order No.
1.
This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode.
2.
No one appears for the petitioners at the time of call. This case is of the year 2013 and nine years have already been passed from the date of filing of this case. As such, the petitioners appear to be recalcitrant litigants and have lost interest in the present litigation. Hence, this CRLMC stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
3.
A copy of this order be communicated to the Court below forthwith. (S. Pujahari) Judge MRS
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Orissa High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMC No. 2185 of 2013).
← Search more judgments