✦ Orissa High Court

Jitendra @ Jitu @ Jitesh Mallick v. State of Orissa

ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMC No. 4123 of 2014S PUJAHARI

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 55. Accordingly, this CRLMC stands dismissed for non- removal of defects. The Petitioner is at liberty to file a better application, if so advised. (S. Pujahari) Judge PKS

Judgment

Order No. ORDER 16.08.2022

1.

This matter is taken up by Hybrid mode.

2.

This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the Petitioner with a prayer to quash the FIR in connection with Kendrapara Sadar P.S. Case No.79 of 2011 corresponding to G.R. Case No.346 of 2011 pending in the court of S.D.J.M., Kendrapara.

3.

It appears that this case is of the year 2014. This Court vide order dated 28.11.2018 granted seven days time to remove the defects as pointed out by the S.R. But the said defects have not yet been removed.

4.

Learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks for an adjournment to remove the defects. This Court is not inclined to adjourn the matter further. // 2 //

5.

Accordingly, this CRLMC stands dismissed for non- removal of defects. The Petitioner is at liberty to file a better application, if so advised. (S. Pujahari) Judge PKS

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Orissa High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMC No. 4123 of 2014). ← Search more judgments