Raghab @ Niranjan Sahoo v. Pintu @ Rudra Narayan Sahoo & Anr.
Case at a glance
- Bench
- S PUJAHARI
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Accordingly, this CRLMC stands dismissed for non- prosecution. (S. Pujahari) Judge MRS
Judgment
Order No. ORDER 23.03.2022
1.
This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode.
2.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. None appears for the opposite party no.1.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has no instruction in the matter.
4.
From the aforesaid, this Court feels that the petitioner is a recalcitrant litigant and not interested to pursue the present litigation.
5.
Accordingly, this CRLMC stands dismissed for non- prosecution. (S. Pujahari) Judge MRS
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Orissa High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMC No. 1043 of 2012).
← Search more judgments