Dinesh Chandra Das v. Union of India & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
With the aforesaid liberty, the writ petition stands disposed of
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. With the aforesaid liberty, the writ petition stands disposed of. (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE Arun/Sukanta (SAVITRI RATHO) JUDGE
Judgment
Petitioner Mr. Millan Kanungo, Sr. Advocate Along with Mr. S.R. Mohanty, Advocate Opposite parties Mr. B.S. Raiguru, CGC Mr. P.P. Mohanty, A.G.A. CORAM: DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO ORDER 16.05.2022 Order No. 01. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
#2. Heard Mr. Millan Kanungo, learned Senior Advocate appearing along with Mr. S.R. Mohanty, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. P.K. Parhi, learned Assistant Solicitor General of India appearing for opposite party no.1; and Mr. P.P. Mohanty, learned Addl. Govt. Advocate appearing for opposite party no.2.
#3. Since the petitioner seeks for resumption of the mining lease in his favour on the plea that he has deposited the entire outstanding dues, this Court is not inclined to entertain this writ petition, as because similar matter is pending before the apex Court. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to pursue his remedy before the appropriate forum, if he is so advised.
#4. With the aforesaid liberty, the writ petition stands disposed of. (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE Arun/Sukanta (SAVITRI RATHO) JUDGE
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.