✦ Orissa High Court

Ansuman Banerjee v. Union of India ..…… Opp. Parties & Ors.

ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No. 12136 of 2022S TALAPATRA, SAVITRI RATHO

Case at a glance

Bench
S TALAPATRA, SAVITRI RATHO

Outcome

Withdrawn

Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty reserved in favour of the petitioner to file a better application. (S. Talapatra) Judge (Savitri Ratho) Judge Rati Ranjan

Judgment

Mr. A.K. Rout, Adv. -Versus- Union of India & Others ..…… Opp. Parties CORAM: JUSTICE S. TALAPATRA JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO ORDER

03.03.2023 Order No.

1.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical Mode).

2.

Mr. A.K. Rout, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that he has instructions to withdraw this writ petition, reserving the right to file a better application. In this regard, a memorandum seeking leave of this court has been filed. The same is taken on record.

3.

We do not find any impediment in allowing the petitioner to withdraw this writ petition.

Operative part

4.

Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty reserved in favour of the petitioner to file a better application. (S. Talapatra) Judge (Savitri Ratho) Judge Rati Ranjan

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Orissa High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No. 12136 of 2022). ← Search more judgments