✦ Orissa High Court

State of Odisha & Anr. v. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode

ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 1290 of 2017B R SARANGI, SAVITRI RATHO

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of as

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE Arun/Sukanta (SAVITRI RATHO) JUDGE

Judgment

Petitioner Mr. P.C. Nayak, Advocate State of Odisha & Another Vs. ….. Opposite parties Mr. P.P. Mohanty, A.G.A. CORAM: DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO ORDER 18.05.2022 Order No. 04. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner by filing a memo in Court today states that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition. The memo so filed be kept on record.

Operative part

3.

In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE Arun/Sukanta (SAVITRI RATHO) JUDGE

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Orissa High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 1290 of 2017). ← Search more judgments