Sanatan Nayak v. State of Odisha & Ors.
Case at a glance
- Bench
- S TALAPATRA, SAVITRI RATHO
Outcome
Withdrawn
Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty reserved to file a fresh writ petition on the same subject matter, if it is so warranted. Pending interlocutory application/s are disposed of,
Judgment
..……. Petitioner Mr. Deepak Kumar Mohapatra, Advocate -Versus- State of Odisha & others ..…….. Opp. Parties Mr. D. Nayak, Addl. Government Advocate Order No. 03. CORAM: JUSTICE S. TALAPATRA JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO ORDER
03.11.2022
This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode. Mr. D.K. Mohapatra, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that he has instruction to withdraw this writ petition with liberty reserved to file a fresh writ petition after removing the defects and incorporating the further facts as might be required in the circumstances.
A memo in this regard has been filed and is available on record. That apart, Mr. Mohapatra, learned counsel has submitted that one Interlocutory Application seeking the same relief has been filed in the Registry.
We do not find any impediment to allow the prayer. 2
Operative part
Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty reserved to file a fresh writ petition on the same subject matter, if it is so warranted. Pending interlocutory application/s are disposed of,
Mr. A.K. Behera, learned counsel appears for the Opp. Party No.7. (S. Talapatra) Judge (Savitri Ratho) Judge Subhasis 3 4
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.