✦ Orissa High Court

Saheda Bibi & Ors. v. State of Odisha

ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No. 1062 of 2022S PUJAHARI2 min read

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

Order No. 01. ORDER 03.03.2022

1.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

The Petitioners apprehending their arrest in Kishannagar P.S. Case No.15 of 2022 registered for alleged commission of offences punishable under Sections 498(A), 323, 307, 506 read with Section 34 of the I.P.C. and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, have filed this petition for their release on pre-arrest bail.

3.

Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioners and the learned counsel for the State.

4.

It appears that the Petitioners No.1 and 2 had earlier approach this Court vide ABLAPL No.7737 of 2021, as they were apprehended registration of the F.I.R. against them, but since the F.I.R. was not registered, this Court was dismissed the bail application giving liberty // 2 // to the Petitioners to approach this Court when there is real and substantial apprehension vide order dated 13th September, 2021.

5.

The allegation of the prosecution is that the Petitioners, who are the mother-in-law, father-in-law, brother-in-law (Dedhasura) and sister-in-law (Nananda) of the Victim-Informant, along with the husband of the Victim-Informant stated to have tortured the Victim- Informant for non-fulfillment of their illegal demand of dowry and also they made an attempt to kill her by throttling her neck.

6.

Regard being had to the facts and submissions made, especially the nature of accusation including the accusation under Section 307 of I.P.C., character of incriminating materials, circumstances in which the offences stated to have been committed, the fact that the matter arises out of marital discord and also it being not disputed that the Petitioners’ release on pre-arrest bail shall not be an hindrance to a free and fair investigation, this Court is of the view that the Petitioners have made out a case for their release on pre-arrest bail, more particularly when they are ready and willing to cooperate with the investigation and they have no chance of absconding and/or tampering with the prosecution evidence, if released on pre-arrest bail.

7.

Hence, this Court directs that in the event of arrest of the Petitioners in connection with the aforesaid case, they be released on // 3 // bail by the Officer effecting arrest on such terms and conditions as deemed just and proper.

8.

However, the aforesaid order is subject to the condition that the Petitioners shall cooperate with the investigation and no other graver offence is reported against the Petitioners besides the aforesaid offences.

9.

The ABLAPL is, accordingly, disposed of being allowed.

10.

Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application. (S. Pujahari) Judge DA

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Orissa High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No. 1062 of 2022). ← Search more judgments