Smt. Nandi Devi v. State of Uttaranchal
Case at a glance
Outcome
Bail granted
Let the applicant be released on bail on her executing a personal bond
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
Smt. Nandi Devi W/o Sri Pan Singh Bisht, R/o Village Avaltani, Patti Mangoli, P.S. Tallital, District Nainital. ………….. Applicant Versus State of Uttaranchal ………….. Opposite Party Arising out of Crime No. 01 of 2006 Under Sections: Police Station: District: 304-B of I.P.C. r/w Sec. ¾ Dowry Prohibition Act Tallital, Nainital. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Heard J.S. Virk, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Nandan Arya, learned A.G.A. for the State. The applicant Smt. Nandi Devi, who is in jail in connection with crime No. 01 of 2006, under Section 304-B of the I.P.C. and under Section ¾ of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, P.S. Tallital, District Nainital, has sought her release on bail. Co-accused Pan Singh Bisht has been released on bail. He was father- in-law of the deceased. Applicant is mother-in-law of the deceased. There is no mention in the F.I.R. as to demand of dowry made by the applicant. The cause of death shown in the postmortem report is asphyxia as a result of hanging. Considering all the circumstances, mentioned above, and the fact that the applicant is a woman, in the opinion of this Court, she deserves bail. Let the applicant be released on bail on her executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nainital. Dt. 12.09.2006 HN (Prafulla C. Pant, J.)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Let the applicant be released on bail on her executing a personal bond
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.