✦ Orissa High Court

Smt. Manorama Padhi v. Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Department of Home Affairs & Ors.

ORISSA AT CUTTACK WPCRL No. 616 of 2013C R DASH, SAVITRI RATHO

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. Accordingly, the WPCRL is dismissed as infructuous. …………………… C.R. Dash, J. …………………… Savitri Ratho, J. S.K. Parida
Read the judgmentFind similar cases

Judgment

Smt. Manorama Padhi Petitioner …. Mr. Neelakantha Panda, Advocate -Versus- Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Department of Home Affairs & others …. Opposite Parties Mrs. Saswata Pattnaik, A.G.A. CORAM: JUSTICE C.R. DASH JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO Order No. ORDER 15.02.2022

1.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual / Physical) Mode.

2.

Mr. Panda, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the WPCRL has become infructuous in the meantime.

3.

Accordingly, the WPCRL is dismissed as infructuous. …………………… C.R. Dash, J. …………………… Savitri Ratho, J. S.K. Parida

Find similar cases Start drafting free

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Related cases why they’re linked — not procedural history

Why is this linked?

Continue researching

Connect this judgment to its cited authorities, statutes, and related legal questions.

Follow cited cases Browse research topics Explore statutes & sections
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Orissa High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. ORISSA AT CUTTACK WPCRL No. 616 of 2013). ← Search more judgments