K.G MATHEW v. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ALAPPUZHA
Judgment
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. FRIDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 16TH PHALGUNA, 1946 WP(C) NO. 37608 OF 2024 PETITIONER/S: K.G MATHEW, AGED 61 YEARS S/O K.A GEORGE, ASHARIPARAMBIL (H), YAMUNA NAGAR, CHENGANNUR TALUK, CHENGANNUR, ALAPPUZHA,, PIN - 689121 BY ADVS. V.VIJITHA HARISHMA P. THAMPI RESPONDENT/S: 1 2 3 4 5 DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ALAPPUZHA, COLLECTORATE, CIVIL STATION, ALAPPUZHA, KERALA, PIN - 688001 SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, CHENGANNUR SUB DIVISION, CHENGANNUR, ALAPPUZHA,, PIN - 689121 CHENGANNUR MUNICIPALITY, CHENGANNUR, ALAPPUZHA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PIN - 689121 MUNICIPAL SECRETARY, CHENGANNUR MUNICIPALITY, CHENGANNUR, ALAPPUZHA,, PIN - 689121 MARIYAMMA ABRAHAM, AGED 78 YEARS, D/O ABRAHAM, KALLUZHATHIL (H), YAMUNA NAGAR, CHENGANNUR TALUK, CHENGANNUR, ALAPPUZHA,, PIN - 689121 WP(C) No.37608 OF 2024 2 BY ADV Haridas V N OTHER PRESENT: Smt. Preetha.K.K, Sr.G.P THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
07.03.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) No.37608 OF 2024 3 J U D G M E N T Notice to the 5th respondent is returned with an endorsement ‘Refused to take’. The relief sought by the petitioner is to implement Ext.P7 order by which the notice was issued to the 5th respondent to cut and remove the branches of the tree which is causing danger to the petitioner. In such circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of directing the 4th respondent to initiate further proceedings pursuant to Ext.P7 and implement the same as expeditiously as possible within a period of one month from the date of receipt of copy of this judgment. Sd/- ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. JUDGE SM/22.03 WP(C) No.37608 OF 2024 4 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 37608/2024 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE PHOTOGRAPH Exhibit P2 Exhibit P3 Exhibit P4 Exhibit P5 Exhibit P6 Exhibit P7 A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 13.02.2020 PREFERRED BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT DATED 21.02.2022 A TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 14.12.2022 PREFERRED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 14.02.2023 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT A TRUE COPY OF THE HEARING NOTICE DATED 11.03.2024 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT A TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL ORDER DATED 08.07.2024 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.