LINTA M. JIHN v. THE STATE OF KERALA
Judgment
before the first respondent. The limited prayer sought by the petitioner is to direct the first respondent to pass orders on the said revision petition and representation, within a time frame. After hearing the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader, I am inclined to dispose of this writ petition. Accordingly, it is ordered that the first respondent shall take up Exts.P7 revision petition and P8 representation and orders thereon shall be passed, after hearing the petitioner and the Manager, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Sd/- ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. JUDGE WP(C) NO. 20708 OF 2024 3 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 20708/2024 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P-1 Exhibit P-2 Exhibit P-3 Exhibit P-4 Exhibit P-5 Exhibit P-6 Exhibit P-7 Exhibit P-8 TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 05.09.2023 TRUE COPY OF THE APPROVAL ORDER NO. RDD/HSE/CNGR/2116/2023-C4 DATED 24.01.2024 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT TRUE COPY OF THE SAID G.O. (RT.) NO.1656/2024/GEDN DATED 28.02.2024 TRUE COPY OF THE MINUTES OF THE STAFF SELECTION COMMITTEE MEETING HELD ON 27.03.2024 TRUE COPY OF THE NON-AVAILABILITY CERTIFICATE SO MADE BY THE DIVISIONAL EMPLOYMENT OFFICER TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO. RDD/HSE/CNGR/1147/2024-C4 DATED 04.05.2024 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION SUB MITTED BY THE MANAGER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED NIL TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 15.05.2024
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.