DR. SHERLY T.R v. THE STATE OF KERALA
Judgment
being aggrieved by the denial of advance increments, fixation of pay and consequential benefits of pension in the light of Exts.P1 and P2. The Principal of the College has already submitted Ext.P3 proposal of fixation of pay before the second respondent. The petitioner also submitted Ext.P4 for considering Ext.P3 and highlighted her grievances. The limited prayer sought by the petitioner is to direct the second respondent to dispose of Exts.P3 and P4 in the light of Exts.P1 and P2. After hearing the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader, I am inclined to dispose of this writ petition. Accordingly, it is ordered that, the second respondent shall take up Exts.P3 and P4 and appropriate orders thereon shall be passed in accordance with law, after WP(C) NO. 25468 OF 2024 3 hearing the petitioner and the third respondent. Orders in this regard shall be passed, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Sd/- ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. JUDGE WP(C) NO. 25468 OF 2024 4 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 25468/2024 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 Exhibit P2 Exhibit P3 Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER GO (MS) NO.183/2022/ FIN DATED 19.10.2022 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER GO (MS) NO.10/2023/FIN DATED 31.01.2023 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO.E1/TS/PAY REVISION 45/2023 DATED 07.09.2023 TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 25.5.2024 OF THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.