SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE(RURAL), ERNAKULAM, ALUVA v. BHASKARAN, AMBATTU HOUSE, PERUMBAVOOR
Judgment
K.M.JOSEPH & K. HARILAL, JJ. ------------------------------------------------------------W.P.(C) No.9878 of 2012-H-----------------------------------------Dated, this the 3rd day of August, 2012J U D G M E N T K.M.Joseph, J. Petitioner has approached this Court complaining ofharassment by police. The 4th respondent is the brother of thepetitioner and the 5th respondent is her mother. 2. We heard the learned counsel for the parties. Wehad actually referred the matter for mediation. Apparently it hasnot been successful. Learned Government Pleader would submitthat petitions are filed by the parties against each other. He wouldsubmit that no crime has been registered against the petitionerand that there will be no harassment of the petitioner. We recordthe said submission and close the Writ Petition (Civil). We make itclear that this will not be a bar for the parties seeking any reliefwhich they may be advised before appropriate forum. (K.M.JOSEPH) JUDGE. ( K. HARILAL) JUDGE.MS
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.