MATHEW ABRAHAM v. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE
Judgment
BY ADV. SRI.A.G.BASIL. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------
SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUVALLA, PIN-689101.
CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUVALLA, PIN-689101.
DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN-689 645.
DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ALAPPUZHA, PIN-688 001.
JIJI K.KOSHY, AGED 35 YEARS, S/O. LATE KOSHY, NEAR CHIPPI THEATRE, OPP: K S R T C BUS STAND, PUTHENPURAYIL, CHENGANNOOR P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN-689 121.
NELSON CHACKO, S/O. LATE CHACKO, CUNARY HOUSE, PUTHENTHERUVU, CHENGANNOOR, PIN-689 101. R1 TO R4 BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. C.R. SYAM KUMAR. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09-08-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C).NO.17927/2012-M: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DTD. 29/07/2012 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE R.1. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE. Prv. K. M. JOSEPH & K. HARILAL, JJ. --------------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 17927 OF 2012 M ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 9th August, 2012 JUDGMENT K.M. Joseph, J. Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a mandamus directing the first respondent to provide adequate police protection to the life of the petitioner and his family members.
2. Briefly put, the case of the petitioner is as follows: Petitioner is doing business of consultation in house building. He is living with his wife and two minor children. In connection with his business, he has to travel from Thiruvalla to Chengannoor frequently. Fifth respondent has been making frequent visits to the work site of the sixth respondent in respect of which the petitioner is the consultant. The case is that the fifth respondent has threatened the petitioner that he would kill the petitioner if he comes to Chengannoor and it is further stated that the fifth WP(C).NO.17927/2012 M 2 respondent has again threatened the petitioner that he would stab him and his family members to death.
3. Though served, there is no appearance for the party respondent. Learned Government Pleader got instructions. On instructions he would submit that actually a petition was received and the fifth respondent was called to the police station, that he came and he apologized that he would not repeat it and, therefore, no crime was registered. We record the said submission and close the Writ Petition. JUDGE Sd/= K. M. JOSEPH, Sd/= K. HARILAL, JUDGE kbk. //True Copy// PS to Judge WP(C).NO.17927/2012 M 3
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.