OP(CRL.) No. 3983 of 2011 · Kerala High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- P S P S GOPINATHAN
Outcome
Disposed of
This petition is disposed of as above
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 227
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. While recording the submission of the respondent, there would be an order declaring satisfaction of Ext.P2 order before the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Thrissur. The respondent is at liberty to withdraw the amount from the Forum below. This petition is disposed of as above.…
Judgment
BY ADVS.SRI.V.SANTHARAM SRI.ANTO THOMAS SRI.LAKSHMEESH.S.KAMATH SRI.P.S.SYAMKUTTAN RESPONDENTS: -------------- ANTONY MALIYEKKAL, 5/55 MALIEYKKAL HOUSE NEAR INFANT JESUS CHURCH, EAST FORT THRISSUR- 680 005. BY ADV. SRI.C.A.CHACKO THIS OP (CRIMINAL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13-03-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: OP(Crl.).No. 3983 of 2011 APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 TRUE COPY O THE C.C. 853/2009 DATED 5.12.2009 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, TRICHUR. EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 26.4.2010 IN C.C. 853/2009. EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE E.A. 61/2010 IN C.C. 853/2009. EXT.P4 TRUE COPY OF THE I.A. 520/2011 IN E.A. 61/10. EXT.P5 EXT.P6 TRUE COPY OF THE UNNUMBERED M.P. OF 2011 ALONG WITH THE COPY OF THE DRAFT FOR RS. 11,760/- ALONG WITH THE POSTAL RECEIPTS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CARDS. TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 15.10.2011 IN I.A. 520/2011 IN E.A. 61/2010 IN C.C. 853/2009 (WRONGLY WRITTEN AS C.C. 853/2008) PASSED BY THE CDRF, TRICHUR. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. // TRUE COPY // KNC/- P.S. TO JUDGE. P.S. GOPINATHAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = O.P. (Crl.) 3983 OF 2011 = = = = = = = = = = = = = DATED THIS, THE 13 th DAY OF MARCH, 2012. J U D G M E N T In this petition under Section 227 of the Constitution of India, petitioners, who are respondents in CC. 853/2009 on the file of the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Thrissur, seeks the following reliefs: i) Issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, calling for the records leading to Exhibit P3 petition and quash the same by declaring satisfaction of the amount awarded under Exhibit-P2, on the basis of Exhibit-P5, for the interests of justice. Or in the alternative Quash Exhibit P6 order as arbitrary, illegal and unjustifiable and direct the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Trichur to denovo consider Exhibit P4 and P5 afresh and pass appropriate orders. ii. to issue such other writ, order or direction as deem fit and proper by this Hon'ble Court according to the facts and circumstances of the case, for the interest of justice.
Today when the petition came up for hearing it is submitted by the learned counsel for the respondent that in compliance of Ext.P2 order of the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, petitioners herein deposited the O.P. (Crl.) 3983/2011 2 amount due as per Ext.P2 through a demand draft and therefore, the respondent has no objection in recording satisfaction of Ext.P2 order.
Operative part
While recording the submission of the respondent, there would be an order declaring satisfaction of Ext.P2 order before the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Thrissur. The respondent is at liberty to withdraw the amount from the Forum below. This petition is disposed of as above. knc/- P.S. GOPINATHAN, (JUDGE)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: This petition is disposed of as above
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 227.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.