L.BABU v. STATE OF KERALA
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn,
Provisions considered
Judgment
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. THURSDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 10TH PHALGUNA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 7402 OF 2019 PETITIONER: L.BABU, AGED 57 YEARS, THENGUVILA PUTHEN VEEDU, CHAKKUVARAKKAL P.O., KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT-691 508 (DAILY WAGE DRIVER RETIRED FROM KOTTARAKKARA DEPOT ON 30/07/2018). BY ADV N.SASIDHARAN UNNITHAN RESPONDENTS: 1 2 3 STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, SOCIAL JUSTICE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 023. DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER, KSRTC, KOTTARKKARA DEPOT, KOLLAM DISTRICT-691 531. BY ADVS. SRI.K.V.SOHAN, STATE ATTORNEY SRI.P.C.CHACKO, SC, SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN, SC SRI.VENUGOPAL, GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
29.02.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO. 7402 OF 2019 2 JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition reserving the liberty of the petitioner to approach the Controlling authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. In the light of the permission sought by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, reserving the liberty as aforesaid. DK Sd/- GOPINATH P. JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn,
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.