Judgment · High Court · 2010
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
This petition is disposed of as above
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 143, 147, 148, 324, 326
Judgment
B.A. No. 8702/2010-:2:-the Court having jurisdiction. Accordingly, the petitionersshall surrender before the investigating officer on 03.01.2011or on 04.01.2011 for the purpose of interrogation andrecovery of incriminating material, if any. In case theinvestigating officer is of the view that having regard to thefacts of the case arrest of the petitioners is imperative he shallrecord his reasons for the arrest in the case-diary as insistedin paragraph 129 of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre's case(supra). The petitioners shall thereafter be produced before theMagistrate or the Court concerned and permitted to file anapplication for regular bail. In case the interrogation of thepetitioners are without arresting them, the petitioners shallthereafter appear before the Magistrate or the Court concernedand apply for regular bail. The Magistrate or the Court onbeing satisfied that the petitioners have been interrogated bythe police shall, after hearing the prosecution as well, consider and dispose of their application for regular bailpreferably on the same date on which it is filed. In case the petitioners while surrendering before theInvestigating Officer have deprived the investigating officersufficient time for interrogation, the officer shall complete the B.A. No. 8702/2010-:3:-interrogation even if it is beyond the time limit fixed as aboveand submit a report to that effect to the Magistrate or theCourt concerned. Likewise, the Magistrate or the Court alsowill not be bound by the time limit fixed as above if sufficienttime was not available after the production or appearance ofthe petitioners . This petition is disposed of as above. Dated this the 23rd day of December, 2010.V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGEsj
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: This petition is disposed of as above
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 143, 147, 148, 324, 326.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Kerala High Court, on 23 Dec 2010. The bench was V RAMKUMAR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.