✦ Kerala High Court

Judgment · High Court

AS No. 7 of 1996V RAMKUMAR, K HARILAL

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

this appeal is dismissed as time barred

Key paragraphs

Para 22. AHAMMEDKUTTY, S/O.VEERANKUTTY, -DO- -DO- BY ADV. SMT.JYOTHIMOL.T. BY SRI.P.VELAYUDHAN,M.VENUGOPALAN,MINI.G. THIS APPEAL SUITS HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19-03- 2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.RAMKUMAR & K.HARILAL, JJ ------------------------------------------------- A.S.No.7 of 1996 -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 19th day of March…

Read the judgment Go to the operative part Find similar cases

Judgment

APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS 2,3,4 AND 5: ---------------------------------

1. ABUBACKER, S/O.VEERANKUTTY KOTTIKOTTIL, VAVULLIAPURAM AMSOM, ALATHUR TALUK (DIED)

2. USSANAR, -DO- -DO-

3. MUHAMMED KHANI, -DO- -DO-

4. ABBAS, -DO- -DO- *ADDL.APPELLANTS

5. SALEENA, D/O.LATE ABOOBACKER, THOLANPUZHA HOUSE, THOLANPUZHA P.O, KAVASSERRY, PALGHAT DIST.

6. SAKHEENA, D/O.LATE ABOOBACKER, -DO- -DO-

7. SAFEENA, D/O.LATE ABOOBACKER, -DO- -DO-

8. KHADEEJA, W/O.LATE ABOOBACKER, -DO- -DO-

9. SHARIF, S/O.LATE ABOOBACKER, -DO- -DO-

10.MOHAMMED RAFEEQU, S/O.LATE ABOOBACKER, -DO- -DO-

11. ASHARAF, S/O.LATE ABOOBACKER, -DO- -DO- *IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DTD.13.3.2012 IN I.A.NO.3815/2000 BY ADVS.SRI.P.N.KRISHNANKUTTY ACHAN(SR.) SRI.K.MOHANA KANNAN RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF & DEFENDANT NO.1: -------------------------------------

KUNJIKOYA, S/O.VEERANKUTTY, KOTTIKOTTIL, VAVULLIAPURAM AMSOM, ALATHUR TALUK.

Operative part

AHAMMEDKUTTY, S/O.VEERANKUTTY, -DO- -DO- BY ADV. SMT.JYOTHIMOL.T. BY SRI.P.VELAYUDHAN,M.VENUGOPALAN,MINI.G. THIS APPEAL SUITS HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19-03- 2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.RAMKUMAR & K.HARILAL, JJ ------------------------------------------------- A.S.No.7 of 1996 -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 19th day of March, 2012 J U D G M E N T V.Ramkumar, J Since the delay petition has already been dismissed, this appeal is dismissed as time barred. V.Ramkumar, Judge K.Harilal, Judge

Find similar cases Start drafting free

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Kerala High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. AS No. 7 of 1996). ← Search more judgments

Judgment

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

Related cases why they’re linked — not procedural history

Continue researching