State Bank of India, Kanhangad Branch v. K. Padmanabhan
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. M. Sreedharan, S/o. Kannan, Muzhakkom, Klayithode P.O., Via Cheruvathoor, Kasargode BY SRI.T.P.KELU NAMBIAR (SR.) ADV. M.RAMESH CHANDER FOR R2 BY SRI.P.G.RAJAGOPALAN R2 BY SRI.M.VIJAYAKUMAR ADV. SRI.A.K.JAYASANKAR NAMBIAR FOR R1 THIS APPEAL FROM FIRST APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19-01-2012, THE COURT ON THE…
Judgment
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL THURSDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF JANUARY 2012/29TH POUSHA 1933 AFA.No. 48 of 1999 ( ) ---------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN AS.417/1991 DATED 21-05-1998 OS.64/1990 of SUB COURT, KASARAGOD APPELLANT(S): ----------- State Bank of India, Kanhangad Branch, by its Manager, Kanhangad P.O. Kasaragode BY ADV. SRI.K.K.CHANDRAN PILLAI RESPONDENT(S): --------------
K. Padmanabhan, S/o. Govindan, residing at Kuttamath, Cheruvathoor Amsom, Cheruvathur P.O., Kasaragode
M.Krishnan, S/o. Kannan, Driver, Muzhakkam, Klayikode P.O. Via Cheruvathoor, Kasargode
M. Sreedharan, S/o. Kannan, Muzhakkom, Klayithode P.O., Via Cheruvathoor, Kasargode BY SRI.T.P.KELU NAMBIAR (SR.) ADV. M.RAMESH CHANDER FOR R2 BY SRI.P.G.RAJAGOPALAN R2 BY SRI.M.VIJAYAKUMAR ADV. SRI.A.K.JAYASANKAR NAMBIAR FOR R1 THIS APPEAL FROM FIRST APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19-01-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR & K.HARILAL, JJ. ........................................... A.F.A. 48 of 1999 ............................................. Dated: 19-01-2012 JUDGMENT Ramkumar, J. The matter has been settled out of court (vide verified petition filed by the appellant's counsel on 2-1-2012). This appeal is accordingly dismissed as not pressed. One-half of the court fee paid the memorandum of Appeal shall be refunded to the appellant. Sd/-V. Ramkumar, Judge. Sd/-K. Harilal, Judge. /true copy/ P.S. to Judge V. RAMKUMAR & K.HARILAL, JJ. ........................................... A.F.A. 48 of 1999 ............................................. Dated: 19-01-2012 JUDGMENT
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.