Judgment · High Court · 2010
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
This petition is disposed of as above
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 379
Judgment
B.A.No.8144/2010 2the Court having jurisdiction. Accordingly, the petitioners shallsurrender before the investigating officer on 03.01.2011 or on04.01.2011 for the purpose of interrogation and recovery ofincriminating material, if any. In case the investigating officer isof the view that having regard to the facts of the case arrest ofthe petitioners is imperative he shall record his reasons for thearrest in the case-diary as insisted in paragraph 129 ofSiddharam Satlingappa Mhetre's case (supra). Thepetitioners shall thereafter be produced before the Magistrate orthe Court concerned and permitted to file an application forregular bail. In case the interrogation of the petitioners arewithout arresting them, the petitioners shall thereafter appearbefore the Magistrate or the Court concerned and apply forregular bail. The Magistrate or the Court on being satisfied thatthe petitioners have been interrogated by the police shall, afterhearing the prosecution as well, consider and dispose oftheir application for regular bail preferably on the samedate on which it is filed. B.A.No.8144/2010 3In case the petitioners while surrendering before theInvestigating Officer have deprived the investigating officersufficient time for interrogation, the officer shall complete theinterrogation even if it is beyond the time limit fixed as aboveand submit a report to that effect to the Magistrate or theCourt concerned. Likewise, the Magistrate or the Court also willnot be bound by the time limit fixed as above if sufficient timewas not available after the production or appearance of thepetitioners . This petition is disposed of as above.V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGEln
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: This petition is disposed of as above
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 34, 379.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Kerala High Court, on 22 Dec 2010. The bench was V RAMKUMARWEDNESDAY, V RAMKUMAR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.