✦ Kerala High Court · 02 Mar 2007

BAIL APPL No. 1288 of 2007 · Kerala High Court

BAIL APPL No. 1288 of 2007V RAMKUMAR

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

The application is disposed of as above

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. Having regard to the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioner and the other circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, a direction is issued to the Investigating Officer to release the petitioner on bail…
  • Para 44. If the petitioner commits breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled. The application is disposed of as above.V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGEmrcs B.A.1288/20073

Judgment

V.RAMKUMAR, J.----------------------------Bail Application No. 1288/2007-----------------------------Dated this 2nd day of March, 2007

O R D E RThe petitioner who is the first accused in CrimeNo.111/2007 of Thanur Police Station for an offence punishable under Section 498-A IPC read with Section 34 IPCseeks anticipatory bail.

2.

I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

3.

Having regard to the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioner and the other circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, a direction is issued to the Investigating Officer to release the petitioner on bail for aperiod of one month in the event of his arrest in connection with the above case on his executing a bond for Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction to the Investigating officer and subject to the following conditions: (a).Petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11a.m. on all Wednesdays. B.A.1288/20072(b). The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation as and when required by the Investigating Officer. (c).The petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall he attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution. (d).Petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail. (e).Petitioner shall surrender before the Magistrate concerned and seek regular bailin the meanwhile.

Operative part

4.

If the petitioner commits breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled. The application is disposed of as above.V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGEmrcs B.A.1288/20073

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The application is disposed of as above

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Indian Penal Code, 1860.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Kerala High Court, on 02 Mar 2007. The bench was V RAMKUMAR.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Kerala High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. BAIL APPL No. 1288 of 2007). ← Search more judgments