NASAR v. STATE & DEFACTO
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Crl. M.C. No.2484 of 20102counsel, that court shall not insist on the personalappearance of the petitioner for the disposal of thedischarge petition. This Crl.M.C is disposed of reserving the above right ofthe petitioner. Dated this the 6th day of July, 2010.V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE dmb
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Kerala High Court, on 06 Jul 2010. The bench was V RAMKUMAR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Kerala High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. CRL.MC No. 2484 of 2010).
← Search more judgments