Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
THE HON’ BLE MR. JUSTICE H.RKEMPANNA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO60S9 OF 2010 APPELLANTS K C RATHNAMMA LATE C ASHOK AflLi;f) %F3flhiT 25: YEARR RUM B HAVANA D/O LATE C ASHOK AGED ABOUt 5 YEARS, RUM REERTHI F) / U LATE; C AS;HOK AGES) ABOUT 3 YEARS. SRI CHANNAPF’A S/U LATE. SRI HAS’aJMAPPA AT B FiviT ISEETHAIVIMA W/G SW CHANNAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YE:ARS 2, N
#4. 5, 4tT1\TC)3:S pjp fly THIS’ ‘ r’•\Y’ (IVI%)TIIEJIS “ D AT 5,3/AL UUA.FSDIA L;DpY r “ MeFANO.6089 of 2010 ALL ARE R/AT CHATR7...LDOI HALLI VILLAGE, PFCLT preq rr -oc- FACT AR T51 ‘TA OTS7RTCT (SRLRAGHUPATHLR, & SRIGC.MAIhJUNATIL ADVOCATE FUR Ad LAW FIRM I RESPONDENTS I..
#2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR KSRTU, MR ROAD, SHANTEIHAGAR, BANGALOEFL500 027 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD ND. l9• 10/I. SOLAR-I END ROAD. BA SAVANAGUDI. HANGALORIL-560 004 REPRESENTED BY ITS NIANAGER This MEA filed U/B 173(1) of MV Act against the Judgment and 4waiil dat.ecI; 7 4 20 10 nasscfi La SILO No, 4751 / 2005 ca the tile Ui xII Additioi.±aI Judge, Court of SmJI.I Causes, ].ltEl.JBER. tdAUT., M.etr o o].ltau Area, fLmgaiorc. (SUCH. No.5), partly eiiowi.ng the claim Ibilowing: UUpV 1 H.) ..at r.1 IleUrasT :i,T{a iar ci ofi I 4 M.RA.NO6089 of 2010 ORDER One weeks t:rne praur to peronle wiTh OtOwe aaieconns failing whjeh, the apoeal shall stand dism.issed without any further orders, T By: MG J:. P y : )w’ JO DOE. Sal”•1 3udL e /n4, .;:: I .n,,1, ler_: ss. ‘1y CwTrojy5r,5 f5isf On .Eoin. Pirp: 4t Th
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.