SANGANAGOUDA v. I. THE KARNATAKA CENTRAL COOPERATIVE
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
made in the memo, writ petition stands disposed of as
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the writ petition may be disposed of as having become infructuous In the light of the statements made In the memo dated 09/04/2010. 3 The memo is taken on record. In the light of the submission…
Judgment
ORDER The petitioner has sought for the following reliefs: A. A writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the order dated 12.5.2008 passed by the 3’d respondent vide Annexure SC”. B. A writ the nature of mandamus directing the 3 respondent to consider and permit the petitioner to engage the service of an advocate. Any other writ or direction as this Hon’bie Court deems fit under the facts of the same in the Interest of justice and equity.” C.
Operative part
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the writ petition may be disposed of as having become infructuous In the light of the statements made In the memo dated 09/04/2010. 3 The memo is taken on record. In the light of the submission and the statements made in the memo, writ petition stands disposed of as having become Infructuous. Ordered accordingly. Sd/ mDGE
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: made in the memo, writ petition stands disposed of as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 226, 227.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.