Kum, Pushpalatha v. The Oriental Insurance Co. Lt.cL
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Limitation Act, 1963 s. 5
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. The delay In filing the appeal has been satisfactorily explained by showing sufficient cause and the same is accepted. For the reasons stated In the affidavit accompanying the application, this MIsc. Cvl. is allowed. Delay of 244 days in filing the appeal is condoned…
Judgment
THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NKPATIL MISC. CVL. 1.3516 OF 2009 IN MJ.A.No. 5292 OF2Qj Between: Kum, Pushpalatha, D/o, Gananna (By Shri, KVShyamaprasada, Advocate) Appellant And: The Oriental Insurance Co. Lt.cL. And another. Respondents (By Shri, MSoxvri Raju. Advocate for RI: rrotice to R2 dispensed with yb, dated 10/01/2012) This Misc, Cvl, is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, praying to condone the delay of 244 days in filing the aiove appeal, in the interest of justice and equity. This Misc. Cvl. comi.n on frr Orders. t.his day, Court made the alh1onin: ORDER This Misc. CvL is filed 1-w the. counsel toy appellant for condoning the delay of 244 days in. filing the appeal. ‘1 A.
I have heard learned counsel appearing for appellant and learned counsel appearing for Insurer.
The delay In filing the appeal has been satisfactorily explained by showing sufficient cause and the same is accepted. For the reasons stated In the affidavit accompanying the application, this MIsc. Cvl. is allowed. Delay of 244 days in filing the appeal is condoned, subject to the condition that the appellant shall not be entitled to any interest for the said period, if she succeeds In the appeal. sd/a JUDGE BMV
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.