✦ Karnataka High Court · 10 Oct 2025

REGIONAL DIRECTOR v. THE MANAGEMENT OF BANGALORE TURF CLUB LIMITED

MFA No. 7680 of 2022JYOTI M

Case at a glance

Outcome

Allowed

Resultantly, the appeal is allowed

Key paragraphs

  • Para 66. Because of disposal of the appeal, interim order granted if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 42

Judgment

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 7680 OF 2022 (ESI) BETWEEN:

1.

REGIONAL DIRECTOR EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION REGIONAL OFFICE, NO.10 BINNYFIELDS, BINNYPET, BENGALURU-23 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER DEPUTY DIRECTOR

2.

THE RECOVERY OFFICER ESI CORPORATION NO.10, BINNYFIELDS, BINNYPET BENGALURU-23 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER DEPUTY DIRECTOR PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA (BY SRI. GEETHA DEVI M.P., ADVOCATE) …APPELLANTS AND: THE MANAGEMENT OF BANGALORE TURF CLUB LIMITED NO.52, RACE COURSE ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY (BY SRI. ANAND K.R., ADVOCATE) …RESPONDENT THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 82(2) OF EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE ACT. - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:4932 MFA No. 7680 of 2022 HC-KAR THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE JUDGMENT IS DELIVERED AS UNDER: ORAL JUDGMENT Smt. Geetha Devi.M.P., counsel for the appellants has appeared in person. Sri. Anand.K.R., counsel for the respondent has appeared through video conferencing.

2. Counsel for the appellants submits that a memo has been filed stating that the appeal may be disposed of in terms of the judgment passed by the Division Bench in MFA No.7035/2022 along with the connected appeals disposed of on 10.10.2025. Counsel for the respondent acknowledges the said submission.

3.

The joint submission made on behalf of the respective parties is placed on record and the memo is also taken on record. - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:4932 MFA No. 7680 of 2022 HC-KAR

4.

The appeal is disposed of in terms of the judgment passed by the Division Bench in MFA No.7035/2022 along with the connected appeals disposed

10.10.2025. Accordingly, dated:27.05.2022 passed by the Employees State Insurance Court at Bengaluru in ESI Application No.24/2015 is set aside.

Operative part

5.

Resultantly, the appeal is allowed.

6.

Because of disposal of the appeal, interim order granted if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 42

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Resultantly, the appeal is allowed

Which court decided this case, and when?

Karnataka High Court, on 10 Oct 2025. The bench was JYOTI M.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. MFA No. 7680 of 2022). ← Search more judgments