RAMACHANDRAPPA v. RENUKAMMA
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Appeal is disposed of
Provisions considered
Judgment
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1123 OF 2020 (PAR) BETWEEN:
1. RAMACHANDRAPPA S/O MADAPPA, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST AND BUSINESSMAN, R/O MAYAKONDA VILLAGE, DAVANAGERE TALUK AND DISTRICT-577534. Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
2. MANJUNATH S/O RAMACHANDRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, BUSINESSMAN, R/O MAYAKONDA VILLAGE, DAVANAGERE TALUK AND DISTRICT-577534. (BY SRI.RAVI.H.K., ADVOCATE) AND:
RENUKAMMA W/O RANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, HOUSEHOLD, R/O MAYAKONDA VILLAGE, DAVANAGERE TALUK AND DISTRICT-577534.
SHIVAMMA HOUSEHOLD W/O THIPPESWAMY, …APPELLANTS - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:46577 RSA No. 1123 of 2020 HC-KAR 68 YEARS, R/O NO.2501, RAIKAR NILAYA, 9TH MAIN, 2ND CROSS, MCC 'A' BLOCK, DAVANAGERE-577534.
NEELAMMA W/O BASAVARAJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/O MORAJI DESAI RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL, VADERAHALLI, KODAGANURU POST, MAYAKONDA HOBLI, DAVANAGERE TALUK AND DISTRICT-577534. (BY SRI.RANGANATH R., ADVOCATE FOR C/R1) …RESPONDENTS THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECITON 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri. Ravi.H.K., counsel for the appellants has appeared through video conferencing. Counsel for the appellants submits that the parties to the lis have settled the dispute in F.D.P No.07/2022 on the file of Prl. Senior Civil Judge and CJM, Davanagere. Counsel therefore, submits that in view of the settlement, the appeal may be disposed of. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:46577 RSA No. 1123 of 2020 HC-KAR The oral submission made by counsel for the appellants is placed on record. Registry concerned has furnished the e-court status of F.D.P No.07/2022. A perusal of the same depicts that the parties to the lis have settled the dispute in Lok-Adalat on
18.04.2022. Since the matter is resolved, the Regular Second Appeal is disposed of. Because of disposal of the appeal, pending interlocutory applications, if any are disposed of and interim direction if any stands discharged. TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21 Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Appeal is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.