SMT A M MANJULAMMA v. COURT OF KARNATAKA
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.4830 OF 2020 (CPC) BETWEEN: SMT A M MANJULAMMA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS D/O A S MUNI REDDY W/O MR A C SUDARSHAN REDDY R/AT NO.23, AGARA VILLAGE BEGUR HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK BANGLAORE-560034 (BY SRI VISHNU M.S., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. PRASANNA KUMAR C S., ADVOCATE) AND: …APPELLANT PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SRI USMAN SAB @ MASTAN SAB AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS SON OF LATE IMAM SAB
SMT SHANAZ AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS W/O MR USMAN SAB @ MASTAN SAB RESPONDENTS NO.1 AND 2 ARE R/AT NO.21, 24TH MAIN 3RD CROSS AGARA VILLAGE BEGUR HOBLI, BANGLAORE-560034
SMT MUNIRATHNA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS W/O MR M VENKATESH - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:6264 MFA No. 4830 of 2020 HC-KAR
SRI M VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS SON OF LATE MUNISWAMY RESPONDENTS NO.3 AND 4 ARE R/AT NO.1/A, 7TH SECTOR 17TH CROSS, 4TH MAIN HSR LAYOUT BANGALORE-560068 (R1, R3 AND R4 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1(r) OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. …RESPONDENTS THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE JUDGMENT IS DELIVERED AS UNDER: ORAL JUDGMENT Sri. Vishnu.M.S., counsel on behalf of Sri. Prasanna Kumar.C.S., for the appellant has appeared through video conferencing. The captioned appeal is filed to set aside the order dated:
03.10.2020 passed by the Court of XXIX Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru (CCH-30) on I.A.Nos.I and II in O.S.No.3907/2020.
2. The Registry concerned has furnished the E-Court status of O.S.No.3907/2020. A perusal of the same depicts that - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:6264 MFA No. 4830 of 2020 HC-KAR the suit has been dismissed on 22.04.2024. In view of disposal of the suit, nothing survives for consideration in the captioned appeal.
3. Resultantly, appeal is dismissed as infructuous. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.