RAMNAGARA - 562 159 v. SRI T.L. KIRAN KUMAR, AGA FOR R-2)
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
In view of the memo, the writ petition is dismissed
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227
Judgment
(BY SRI. JAI PRAKASH REDDY M, ADVOCATE) AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION, M.S. BUILDING BANGALORE 560 001.
THE CO-OPERATIVE ELECTION AUTHORITY 3RD FLOOR, SHANTHINAGAR TTMC A BLOCK, K H ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU 560027 BY ITS COMMISSIONER.
THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, RAMNAGARA DISTRICT, RAMNAGARA - 562 159. …PETITIONERS
THE YALIYURU MILK PRODUCERS CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., VIRUPAKSHIPURA HOBLI, CHANNAPATNA TALUK, RAMNAGARA DISTRICT - 562 138. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER REGISTERED UNDER KARNATAKA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT. - 6 - NC: 2025:KHC:33402 WP No. 21370 of 2025 HC-KAR
THE RETURNING OFFICER YALIYURU MILK PRODUCERS CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., VIRUPAKSHIPURA HOBLI, CHANNAPATNA TALUK, RAMNAGARA DISTRICT 562138. (BY SRI. HARISHA A.S., AGA FOR R-1, R-3 & R-5; SRI T.L. KIRAN KUMAR, AGA FOR R-2) …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT OF DIRECTION, DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO CONDUCT THE ELECTIONS TO THE RESPONDENT NO.4 SOCIETY BY INCLUDING THE NAMES OF THE PETITIONERS IN THE ELIGIBLE VOTERS LIST OF RESPONDENT NO. 4 SOCIETY AS PER CALENDAR OF EVENTS DATED 05-07-2025 VIDE ANNEXURE-C ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.5 AND PERMIT THEM TO CAST THEIR VOTE IN THE ENSUING ELECTION ON 23-07-2025. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo dated 28.08.2025 stating that the writ petition has become infructuous.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have pursuant to the interim order dated - 7 - NC: 2025:KHC:33402 WP No. 21370 of 2025 HC-KAR
21.07.2025, not availed the benefit and have not cast the votes and therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous.
Operative part
3. In view of the memo, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE BKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the memo, the writ petition is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 226, 227.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.