CRL.P No. 2274 of 2019 · Karnataka High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
In view of the memo, the Petition is dismissed as
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 482
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 143, 147, 149, 427, 447, 506
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. In view of the memo, the Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, I.A. No.1/2019 for stay does not survive for consideration and the same stands disposed of. SMA/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33 Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2274 OF 2019 BETWEEN: SRI. ANTHONY CHAKO S/O. LATE P.J. CHAKO, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT, 429, 5TH MAIN, HRBR LAYOUT, BANGALORE-560034 (BY SRI. KALYAN R., ADVOCATE) AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY KOTHANNUR POLICE, REF BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT BANGALORE-01 …PETITIONER Digitally signed by HEMALATHA J Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SMT. KENCHAMMA W/O. LATE CHIKKATHIMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 92 YEARS, R/AT NO. 2200/1, 1ST MAIN, MAIN ROAD, K G HALLI, VINOBHA NAGAR, HAREBIC COLLEGE POST, BANGALORE-560045 RESPONDENT NO.2 EXPIRED (BY SRI. M.R.PATIL, HIGH COURT GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR RESPONDENT NO.1; SRI. D.A.SHIVAKUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.2) …RESPONDENTS - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:16687 CRL.P No. 2274 of 2019 HC-KAR THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 PRAYING TO QUASH THE CHARGE SHEET FILED BY THE KOTHANUR POLICE IN CRIME NO.94/2014 FOR OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 143, 147, 427, 447, 506 READ WITH SECTION 149 OF IPC AND CONSEQUENTLY TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER OF ISSUE OF SUMMONS DATED 01.02.2016 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE XI ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, BANGALORE IN C.C.NO.50546/2016 IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER IS CONCERNED. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the petition.
2. The memo is taken on record.
Operative part
In view of the memo, the Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, I.A. No.1/2019 for stay does not survive for consideration and the same stands disposed of. SMA/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33 Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the memo, the Petition is dismissed as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 143, 147, 149, 427, 447, 506.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.