SRI. GANESH D.S v. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY INDIRANAGAR P.S
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, this petition is dismissed
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 482
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 406, 420
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. It however open for the petitioner to raise contentions urged in this petition in any petition that may be filed by him challenging the charge sheet. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE PMR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 42
Judgment
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 7086 OF 2018 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: SRI. GANESH D.S. S/O LATE D.N.SUBBUKRISHNA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, NO.76, 4TH MAIN, 15TH CROSS, MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU-560 003 (BY SRI. SANDESH J. CHOUTA, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SRINIVAS RAO S.S., ADVOCATE) …PETITIONER AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY INDIRANAGAR P.S. BANGALORE REPRESENTED BY SPP HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU-560001.
SRI. GANESH ANDHAVARAP S/O NAGARAJ, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, NO.B-601, DSR SPRING BEUTY, ITPL MAIN ROAD, BROKFIELD, KUNDALAHALLI, BENGALURU-560 037 ALSO AT NO.22-97, GANDI NAGAR-3 N PET, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT ANDRA PRADESH. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAJATH SUBRAMANYAM, HIGH COURT GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR RESPONDENT NO.1; - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:19148 CRL.P No. 7086 of 2018 HC-KAR SRI. GIRISH D.S., ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.2) THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS, FIR AND COMPLAINT DATED 20.03.2018 IN CRIME NO.84/2018 REGISTERED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1, INDIRA NAGAR POLICE AGAINST THE PETITIONER FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 406, 420 R/W 34 OF IPC, PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE IV ACMM, BANGALORE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL ORDER The petitioner has challenged an FIR registered against him in Crime No.84/2018 by the respondent No.1 for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420 read with Section 34 of IPC pending on the file of the IV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru.
2. When this petition is listed for hearing, it is stated by the learned counsel for respondent No.2 that a charge sheet is filed and the Trial Court has taken cognizance and issued process on 04.04.2026 in C.C.No.21017/2026. In that view of the matter, this petition does not survive for consideration. - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:19148 CRL.P No. 7086 of 2018 HC-KAR
Operative part
Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. It however open for the petitioner to raise contentions urged in this petition in any petition that may be filed by him challenging the charge sheet. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE PMR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 42
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this petition is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482; Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 34, 406, 420.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.