THE LEGAL MANAGER v. PUTTALAKSHMAMMA
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
- Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 s. 173(1)
Judgment
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH & SMT. P.V. KALPANA, MEMBER M.F.A.No.8301/2019(MV) (Lok Adalat No.3506/2024) BETWEEN THE LEGAL MANAGER SHRIRAM GIC LTD., INDUSTRIAL AREA SITAPURA JAIPUR RAJASTHAN NOW REP BY SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., NO.5/4, 3RD FLOOR, S V ARCADE BELEKAHALLI MAIN ROAD OFF. B.G.ROAD LIMB POST BENGALURU - 560 076. (BY SRI PRADEEP B, ADVOCATE) AND 1 . PUTTALAKSHMAMMA W/O LATE KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, ...APPELLANT 2 2 . K. LOKESH S/O LATE KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, 3 . K. CHETHANA S/O LATE KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, ALL ARE R/AT KARTHIKERE VILLAGE AND POST CHIKKAMAGALURU TALUK 4 . SARDAR AHMED S/O AHAMED JAN SAB AGED ABOUT 58 YARS, R/O KUDINEERAMUDDINAHALLI VILLAGE, HUNSUR TALUK, MYSORE DISTRICT. 5 . DINESH N S/O NAGARAJAPPA R/O 80, ARKAVATHI CROSS OPP. WATER PARK, GURURAJA LAYOUT, MYSORE. 6 . NANJAPPA R S/O RACHAPPANAYAK NO.787, 7TH CROSS 12TH MAIN ROAD, K.H. ROAD, KUVEMPUNAGAR, MYSORE. ….RESPONDENTS THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED.26.07.2019, PASSED IN MVC 3 NO.280/2016, ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND MACT, CHIKKAMAGALURU AND ETC. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED. CONCILIATION ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the appellant has filed a memo for withdrawal of the appeal as not pressed. In view of the said memo, the learned counsel for the appellant is permitted to withdraw the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. The amount in deposit, if any, is ordered to be transmitted to the Tribunal. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER SN
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — s. 173(1).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.